emma_in_dream: (Default)
Tanya Huff, Valor's Choice (2000)

I enjoy military SF, though only when it manages to not descend into neo-colonialism with completely inhuman and unlikeable aliens. I like this book particularly, because the narrator, Staff Sergeant Torin Kerr, views the enemy as 'hormonally hopped up males'.

The plot is based loosely on the 1879 battle of Rorke's Drift in the Zulu wars. Which is to say, there's a small group of soldiers with superior weaponry fighting defensively against a large number of poorly armed aggressors.

I note that I am cruising through this challenge, largely because I just get to reread enjoyable Tanya Huff light reading.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
Adrienne Rich, The Fact of a Door Frame: Poems Selected and New, 1950 - 1984 (1984)

‘My politics is in my body, accruing and expanding with every act of resistance and each of my failures’ (Tear Gas, 1969)

I love this collection - but really only for the works from the late 60s onwards. Rich was obviously a talented writer early on, and her early works are full of allusions to Western poetic traditions. But they are so careful and so hedged.

It is only after she gets angry that Rich gets interesting. Her poetry is perhaps slightly less polished, but much more incisive.
emma_in_dream: (avon)
#26 Tanya Huff, Smoke and Mirrors (2005) # 27 Smoke and Ashes (2006)

This wraps up the Smoke series which details the adventures of Tony, the ex-street kid who is currently working as an assistant on a third rate vampire detective TV series while simultaneously learning to be a wizard.

Tony reaches his adulthood in these two. He doesn't need to rely on Henry the vampire any more and, of course, he gets the reward of the is he-isn't he gay, incredibly gorgeous, co-star of the vampire detective TV series.

In fact it was only the long drawn out indecision about whether or not he would get the cheese burger/reward/I mean incredibly handsome, kind and fabulous guy that annoyed me about the books. *Obviously* he would because he is the hero. Tony's feeble cries of 'but he's straight' were as naught in comparison with chorus of supporting characters shouting 'but he lurves you!'.
emma_in_dream: (uhura)
After Marlowe' violent and mysterious death, he was reported as saying:'All they that love not Tobacco and Boys are fools'. Of course, this accusation came amidst accusations of heresy, of atheism, of drug use and of spying. So, who knows? Plus, of course, it is hard to tell how Elizabethans might have viewed male/male sex, but almost certainly not as an identity.

However, I'm going to count Marlowe just as I did Sapho - on the grounds that they have been claimed as queer ancestors.

Additionally, Marlowe's choice of subject matter is a *big gay call out*. He wrote about Edward II, whose affection for his favourite Gaveston made him notorious in the late medieval and early modern periods. Check out Gaveston's vision of how he would entertain the king:

'Therefore I'll have Italian masques by night,
Sweet speeches, comedies and pleasing shows,
And in the day when he shall walk abroad,
Like sylvan nymphs my pages shall be clad,
My men like satyrs grazing on the lawns
Shall with their goat feet dance an antic hay;
Sometimes a lovely boy in Dian's shape,
With hair that gilds teh water as it glides,
Crownets of pearl about his naked arms,
And in his sportful hands an olive-tree
To hide those parts which men delight to see,
Shall bathe him in a spring...' (Act 1, Scene 1, lines 54-65)
emma_in_dream: (Default)
Tanya Huff takes a big leap forward in this book, the start of a spin off series from the Blood books. *Smoke and Shadows* is, I think, a far better written story with much more complex supporting characters.

The Blood books are essentially Henry, Vicki and Mike with a little bit of Tony the sidekick. In the Shadow series Tony moves to the centre-stage and there is a cast of well-developed background characters.

Tony has begun work as a production assistant in TV, a world in which magic seems to happen. Meanwhile he is still connected to the paranormal world, and has to ward off an invasion of the earth by an evil wizard from an alternate world while not blowing his cover or losing his job.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
The editor, David Bergman, chose short stories that challenge and disturb. Which is a quite reasonable approach to a collection, but I was so put off by the first story in the collection that I could not appreciate the whole.

Keith Banner's "Holding Hands for Safety" is the lead piece in the collection, and as far as I am concerned it is not really a story about human beings but about a world universally populated by sociopaths. Not one single character is anything other than physically, morally and intellectually repugnant. The two gay characters are possibly even more repellant than the others, but only because you see more of them on screen. Even the murder victim is repulsive. So Bergman succeeded in disturbing me, but frankly I see little value in creating a world which bears zero resemblance to the world anyone not in a warzone knows.

Despite being so put off by Banner's work, there were stories of value in the collection. Reginald Harris' "A Tour of the Collection" was technically interesting, and Greg Johnson's "The Death of Jackie Kennedy" was moving. Nonetheless, the collection is not a keeper.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
Josephine Balmer put together a collection of the surviving work of women poets of Greece and Rome.

Some of them survive in the merest snatches. Sulpicia the Satirist is represented by two lines, which survived in a study on Juvenal (her well known, male, contemporary). The review of Juvenal itself disappeared but was quoted by an Italian Renaissance scholar. So, here is her entire surviving oevre:

‘If we could only set it straight, restore that sagging mattress -
then you’d see me stripped, laid bare, entwined with Calenus.’

Virtually nothing is known about the authors - mostly what can be gleaned from the surviving fragments of their work. But I am going to count Sapho, as she and her home island have become adjectives for same-sex love.

‘Sapho represents, then, all the lost women of genius in literary history, especially all the lesbian artists whose work has been destroyed, sanitised or heterosexualised in an attempt to evade “lesbian intertextuality”.’ Susan Gubar, Re-Reading Sapho: Reception and Transmission (1996)

Sapho wrote:

The muses have made me happy
in my lifetime.

And when I die
I shall never be forgotten.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
I think the series really takes off at this point. Vicki finally makes a choice between the human detective Mike and the vampire prince Henry. Also, the emotional tension gets much higher as *Blood Pact* (1993) is a zombie story - but the zombie in question is Vicki's recently deceased mother. It's a genuinely scary situation.

*Blood Debt* (1997) is also genuinely scary - it features the ghosts of people murdered so their organs could be harvested. My copy came with a complimentary edition of *Blood Bank* (2006), a collection of short stories about Henry, Tony, Mike and Vicki. I am a completist but I was not so gripped that I would have bought it otherwise.

Both novels and the short story collection show Tony, a minor character in the first few novels, coming into his own. You understand how he gets a spin off series (the Shadow books which are next on my list).
emma_in_dream: (Elizabeth Peters)
I ended my last review of the Blood series by asking what’s not to like about it. Someone rightly commented that the next one is just the same, and the one after that, and the one after that.

That’s true enough, but I don’t mnd because this series is comfort reading for me. I don’t mind that every book follows a formulae - introduce the monster of the week, have Mike the human detective and Henry the charismatic vampire fight for Vicki’s attention, have Vicki shy away from commitment. I know what to expect and it’s nice to sometimes read a book that isn’t a challenge.

BTW: This is probably my least favourite of the series, possibly because the monster of the week is a mummy and they are intrinsically funny in a Scooby Doo, accidentally unwound, lurching, undead way.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
Nicola Griffith and Stephen Pagel (Eds), Bending the Landscape: Fantasy (1996) and Bending the Landscape: Horror (2001)

The fantasy anthology features a lot of authors I like - Ellen Kushner, Delia Sherman, Tanya Huff - and yet I did not like it.

On the other hand, the horror anthology is the last, and in my opinion, the strongest, of Nicola Griffith and Stephen Pagel’s *Bending the Landscape* series. There is plenty of scope for strong stories exploring queerness in horror stories.

The standouts for me:

Alexi Smart’s ‘Broken Canes’ really captures the horror of knowing you have seen a terrible crime but not being believed because you are too young, girls, and queer to boot.

Even more creepy is Mark W Tiedemann’s ‘Passing’ in which the protagonist turns himself into the enemy in order to survive.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
This a collection of SF short stories arranged around the theme of the Alien, in which the alien is a lesbian or gay man in a straight society treating them as aliens.

My favourite was the leading story, Keith Hartman’s “Sex Guns, and Baptists”, a hard boiled detective story set a generation from now when gene testing and selective abortion has eliminated most gay people. What I like about this story is that it has great world building despite being only 13 pages long.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
It is hard to believe that Tanya Huff began the *Blood Price* series nearly twenty years ago. They’ve held up well as urban fantasy. Plus, with her intelligent vampire Henry, she was an early rider of the paranormal romance wave.

The *Blood Price* series charts the adventures of Vicki, a Toronto detective who was forced into early retirement from the Police force by her deteriorating vision. Matched against her lack of night vision is Henry’s inability to work during the day. The two work together to solve paranormal crimes.

In *Blood Price* Vicki inadvertently gets involved in pursuing a murderous demon controlled by a teen loner. In the process she meets Henry, a 450 year old vampire who was born Henry VIII’s illegitimate son, and considers her relationship with her ex-Police partner Mike. In *Blood* she investigates a series of grisly murders against a pack of opera-loving werewolves.

Zippy plots, good characterisation, a competent heroine, a rounded cast of supporting characters, including some casually introduced gay and lesbian relationships - what’s not to like?
emma_in_dream: (call me a cab)
It is quite hard for me to review this work fairly, as I read it under very difficult circumstances. Pearl went into a non-sleeping frenzy and I read it for hours and hours while I crouched over her cot.

So I was pretty easily irritated as I read it.

Her starting point is that art and beauty are indivisible, and that true art is a transcendental experience. She takes art seriously. She writes of the need to spend time reading, looking at pictures, thinking about what it means, engaging with art.

Part of me really admires this. Art is important. It does require effort.

On the other hand, there is something about Winterson’s writing which sets my teeth on edge; something about her writing seems so elitest. For instance, there is a point where she says: ‘Inevitably, if you start to love pictures, you will start to buy pictures. The time, like the money, can be found, and those who call the whole business elitest, might be fair enough to reckon up the time they spend in front of the television, at the DIY store, and how much the latest satellite equipment and new PC has cost.’

To begin with, she assumes that you cannot use your TV or computer to access real art. This just reinforces the division between fan/pro, amateur/museum art which I find so gratingly tedious. I’ve heard this argument a million times.

The art she celebrates is relatively expensive, produced by professionals (who are individual geniuses, certainly no kind of collaboration), bought from galleries. What she condemns is the mass produced, and anything made for mass consumption. She writes that the nineteenth-century increase in education meant that there was a massive of audience of people who were not members of the literati. ‘Mass literacy was not a campaign to improve the culture and sensibility of the nation, it was designed to make the masses more useful. The writer faced another new problem: his public were no longer his educated equals.’

So I am really torn by these essays. On one hand, Winterson is right that our culture does not take art seriously. On the other, she dismisses so much art that I do take seriously - art made by fans, art by amateurs, art sold at cons, art given away as gifts. Perhaps it is inevitable, given that Winterson is a professional writer, that she should see art as a calling accessible only to a few serious individuals. But, as an amateur who nonetheless sometimes makes art, I find this is a very difficult proposition to accept.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
The first four pages of *Toddle Waddle* read ‘Toddle, waddle. Flip, flop. Hurry, scurry. Clip, clop.’ It’s a delightful romp with language, spot on for a toddler. And, obviously, once again, a large part of the genius of the book is the illustrations by Nick Sharratt.

He uses bold colours and clear images with enough detail that my two year old daughter can examine them for a long while. His visual jokes are just the right level for her - the frog sitting on the boy’s head makes her laugh.

I sometimes hear Pearl lying in her bed recitign some of the lines of the book to herself. Clearly she is thinking of it happily.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
A mixed bag, including lots of Queer Lit 50 challenge books (read during Pearl's ongoing, non-sleeping streak).

I also finished the *Twilight* series because I feel I should read it before dismissing it. So now I dismiss it as a particularly pernicious pro-domestic violence, pro-child abuse screed disguised as a romance.

Read more... )
emma_in_dream: (Default)
*Teleny, or the Reverse of the Medal* was published in a limited edition of 200 de luxe, carefully circulated copies in 1893. The care was essential as this is a work of gay porn.

The book is famously associated with Oscar Wilde. A bookseller claimed he had held a copy of the book for a round robin of authors including Oscar Wilde; Wilde’s publisher also sold a line of erotica, including *Teleny*.

One sees why people associate it with Wilde. The style is very reminiscent of *The Picture of Dorian Grey* (1890). It has the same hothouse atmosphere, the same scent of heliotrope, the same slender youths with lavender gloves and drooping dissipated eyelids. What it also has, of course, is lots of priaptic unions.

Cut for weird nineteenth-century porn.

Read more... )

I chose it because of the Wilde association, but I regret it.
emma_in_dream: (Default)
This collection of essays, reviews and critical works brings together some of Woolf’s shorter works on women and writing, women and politics, and women and art. It is probably best read as a companion piece to *A Room of One’s Own*.

My favourite essays are those in which she is most intemperate and pointed, such as her letter to *New Statesman* in response to a book review by her friend Desmond MacCarthy (writing as Affable Hawk) who accepted the proposition that there had not been a single great woman artist. With vitriol Woolf wrote:

‘Naturally, I cannot claim I know Greek as Mr Bennett and Affable Hawk know it, but I have often been told that Sapho was a woman, and that Plato and Aristotle placed her with Homer and Archilochus among the greatest of their poets. That Mr Bennett can name fifty of the male sex who are indisputably her superior is therefore a welcome surprise, and if he will publish their names I will promise, as an act of that submission which is so dear to my sex, not only to buy their works but, so far as my faculties allow, to learn them by heart.’

Affable Hawk responded:

‘If the freedom and education of women is impeded by the expression of my views, I shall argue no more.’
emma_in_dream: (call me a cab)
Linda de Haan and Stern Nigland's *King and King* (2002) and *King and King and Family* (2004) are two of my daughter’s favourite books. I think they hit all the right notes for a two year old.

The illustrations are funny, with their pet cat, the Crown Kitty, doing something naughty on virtually every page. *King and King and Family* features plenty of animals, and so gets her seal of approval. And, best of all, both Kings wear their crowns on every page. Pearl likes royalty - even pictures of the Queen on coins interest her - and so she likes pictures of the two handsome Kings.

The two books tell the story of Prince Bertie whose mother decides he must marry. Unfortunately Prince Bertie doesn’t like any of the princesses but when he sees Prince Lee it is love at first sight. They marry. As the text says slyly, ‘The wedding was very special. The Queen even shed a tear or two.’ Then they live happily ever after, known as King and King, and going on a honeymoon in the sequel. In the course of this second adventure they see lots of animals taking care of their babies and they adopt Princess Daisy.

These books are obviously designed to promote a message of social inclusion and I must say that on at least one occasion I have seen my daughter puzzling over the message. She has pointed out to me that the two Kings kissing are ‘two daddies’, before getting distracted by Prince Lee’s goatee and sparkling teeth. So, ideas are slowly percolating away in her dear little head.

Currently our copies are on loan to a four year old who told her parents that only men and women can get married. Pearl regularly asks where they are. I’ve been reading them to her frequently for at least nine months, so they’ve been great value. Any book that holds her attention over such a developmental period is a very good book indeed.

(Although obviously my opinion is not shared by all parents as there was a lawsuit to try to have it removed from a school library in Massachusetts and it features on the most often challenged library books list).
emma_in_dream: (call me a cab)
Virginia Woolf developed a perfectly smooth style, a style which grew more controlled, more polished with every novel. Her writing was like a water smoothed pebbles, completely self contained.

A confession: I don’t like her style. I find her novels so smooth as to be virtually unreadable.

But I do like her shorter, non-fiction works which are not smooth at all. Her reviews and critical essays are spiky and even funny.

She sometimes skewers her subjects, as when she reviews a biography of Maria Edgeworth ‘whose work filial piety calls autumnal but the critic must call bad’.

*Books and Portraits* is a collection of Woolf’s minor reviews and essays, work that was not considered worthy of collecting in print until 1977 when her first *Common Reader* of reviews and essays was produced as early as 1925. And yet, they rock!
emma_in_dream: (Default)
The routine check up with midwives on Friday shows that SLF has spent the last month growing at a monster rate and is now apparently six centimetres taller than she should be. Genetics were suggested as an explanation but I scoffed at that. No other explanations were offered, and I must wait two more weeks before seeing a doctor in overworked public system.

And yet this is not at the forefront of my mind. What I am obsessed with is the gearbox of the car. Apparently the pins of the carriers failed and all the gears are destroyed and the box itself is holed. The cheapest solution appears to be a second hand gear box, but I am told there are very few available and I am still looking at a cost of $1500 for the part, plus the same for labour, which is money which frankly I don’t have given that I stop work in six weeks.

And I am so ticked off that I have wound up in this position because of the stupid hail storm in March. Because it totalled my car I had to get another one. Because everyone else was buying at the same time I had a choice of one slightly overpriced car and had to get one without a service record. Although I had it inspected and immediately serviced, it has conked out. Because it was second hand it did not have warranty. Because I have had it for more than three months (22 days more), it no longer has second hand caryard warranty. Because it just broke, rather than being in a crash, it is not covered by insurance. And so I am left with an enormous bill.

I am so stressed by this that I am barely even thinking about the much more serious massive child issue. Why? What does this mean? Why such a porker? I have so far resisted Googling it but I don’t know if I can hold out for two weeks.

All this is exacerbated by Pearl’s terrible sleep patterns. She has been completely thrown by the new fridge. (No, don’t laugh, having lots of people over two weeks in a row, things moved about, then having to walk about at night so the RAC could pick up the car, has totalled her sleep patterns). She is back to only wanting to sleep while being held which is really exhausting me. This is why I am zooming through the Queer Lit 50 challenge – I am reading them at night in the long hours that I spend holding her.

This augers very badly for the future. If getting a new white good has disrupted her routine to this extent, I cannot imagine what she will be like with a new sister. I dread it.

Of course I feel rotten about my self-preoccupation. Some of my friends have real problems. I just have a mysteriously big SLF, a non-sleeping toddler and a money hole.

Profile

emma_in_dream: (Default)
emma_in_dream

December 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 03:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios