Medical consent
Jan. 3rd, 2011 08:02 amI want to write about the birth (and the issue of medical consent) before I forget it.
Going through labour made me realise how meaningless the issue of medical consent is. When I had the epidural the doctor explained the possible side effects, but it was merely an exercise he had to go through for legal reasons.
I could only hear intermittently. When I was in the midst of a contraction, I could neither hear or see. I could only feel pain.* It was as though he was speaking in another room, sometimes inaudibly.
I could certainly not speak in response. Or understand what I could occasionally hear.
And, frankly, even if I had been able to understand him, I would have taken it even if he was saying there was a ten per cent chance of a crocodile eating my head.
Now it didn’t matter because I had done lots of reading beforehand. I could occasionally hear him and recognised some of the risks he mentioned. And I had written down that I wanted an epidural in my plan, as well as signing a heap of papers beforehand which I think included permission for an epidural.
On the other hand, it made me think about how meaningless it must be for doctors to ask for patients to make decisions in circumstances where they are unexpectedly in pain and have to make major life decisions.
The law considers us to be rational beings at all times - it’s a legal concept called the reasonable man (ie. what would a reasonable man do) - but there are obviously circumstances when we are incapable of researching, measuring options and making the best decision.
I was particularly wondering about the experiences of my friends who have had serious illnesses. I was wondering if you wanted to talk about it.
* Lots of pain. I had always heard that morphine was a strong drug. They gave me some and all it did was alter the pain from so unendurable I was barely conscious to unendurable.
Going through labour made me realise how meaningless the issue of medical consent is. When I had the epidural the doctor explained the possible side effects, but it was merely an exercise he had to go through for legal reasons.
I could only hear intermittently. When I was in the midst of a contraction, I could neither hear or see. I could only feel pain.* It was as though he was speaking in another room, sometimes inaudibly.
I could certainly not speak in response. Or understand what I could occasionally hear.
And, frankly, even if I had been able to understand him, I would have taken it even if he was saying there was a ten per cent chance of a crocodile eating my head.
Now it didn’t matter because I had done lots of reading beforehand. I could occasionally hear him and recognised some of the risks he mentioned. And I had written down that I wanted an epidural in my plan, as well as signing a heap of papers beforehand which I think included permission for an epidural.
On the other hand, it made me think about how meaningless it must be for doctors to ask for patients to make decisions in circumstances where they are unexpectedly in pain and have to make major life decisions.
The law considers us to be rational beings at all times - it’s a legal concept called the reasonable man (ie. what would a reasonable man do) - but there are obviously circumstances when we are incapable of researching, measuring options and making the best decision.
I was particularly wondering about the experiences of my friends who have had serious illnesses. I was wondering if you wanted to talk about it.
* Lots of pain. I had always heard that morphine was a strong drug. They gave me some and all it did was alter the pain from so unendurable I was barely conscious to unendurable.